Skills

Validated instruments

The questionnaires Neutropic knows by their published rules — items, reverse-keyed items, scoring, cut-offs, original source, licence and reported reliability — used by study design, survey analysis, manuscript writing and peer review.

Neutropic keeps a registry of validated questionnaires so that the same facts appear everywhere: the study-design report names the instrument with its source and licence, score_instrument applies the published scoring (reverse-keyed items, subscales, multipliers, prorating, cut-off bands) and reports the in-sample α next to the published α, the manuscript's Methods cites the original source, and the peer-review guideline check flags an instrument used without a citation.

Ask "what is in the instrument registry?" or "look up the PSS-10" in any chat, or run /survey on your data. Instruments marked manual (PSQI, IPAQ-SF, AttrakDiff, IPQ) need their published algorithm or item map; the agent follows the registry's instructions in code. Cut-offs marked informal are conventions, not diagnostic thresholds. Licence status is a pointer, not legal advice — check the holder's terms before reproducing items.

Mental health

InstrumentItems · responseScoringCut-offsSourceLicenceKorean version
PHQ-9 — Patient Health Questionnaire-99 · 0–3sum; range 0–270–4 minimal; 5–9 mild; 10–14 moderate; 15–19 moderately severe; 20–27 severeKroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001)freeHan, C., Jo, S. A., Kwak, J.-H., et al. (2008)
PHQ-2 — Patient Health Questionnaire-22 · 0–3sum; range 0–60–2 negative screen; 3–6 positive screenKroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2003)free—
GAD-7 — Generalized Anxiety Disorder-77 · 0–3sum; range 0–210–4 minimal; 5–9 mild; 10–14 moderate; 15–21 severeSpitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006)freeSeo, J.-G., & Park, S.-P. (2015)
DASS-21 — Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (21-item)21 · 0–3sum; × 2; 3 subscales; range 0–42(Depression) 0–9 normal; 10–13 mild; 14–20 moderate; 21–27 severe; 28–42 extremely severe …Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995)00075-U)free—
CES-D — Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale20 · 0–3sum; R: 4,8,12,16; range 0–600–15 below screening threshold; 16–60 possible depression (≥16)Radloff, L. S. (1977)freeCho, M. J., & Kim, K. H. (1998)
K10 — Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (10-item)10 · 1–5sum; range 10–5010–19 likely to be well; 20–24 mild distress; 25–29 moderate distress; 30–50 severe distressKessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., et al. (2002)free—
BDI-II — Beck Depression Inventory-II21 · 0–3sum; range 0–630–13 minimal; 14–19 mild; 20–28 moderate; 29–63 severeBeck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996)commercialSung, H. M., Kim, J. B., Park, Y. N., Bai, D. S., Lee, S. H., & Ahn, H. N. (2008)
STAI (Form Y) — State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Form Y40 · 1–4sum; R: 1,2,5,8,10,11,15,16,19,20,21,23,26,27,30,33,34,36,39; 2 subscales; range 20–8020–37 low (informal); 38–44 moderate (informal); 45–80 high (informal)Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983)commercialHahn, D.-W., Lee, C.-H., & Chon, K.-K. (1996)
PCL-5 — PTSD Checklist for DSM-520 · 0–4sum; 4 subscales; range 0–800–30 below provisional PTSD threshold; 31–80 probable PTSD (≥31–33)Weathers, F. W., Litz, B. T., Keane, T. M., Palmieri, P. A., Marx, B. P., & Schnurr, P. P. (2013)free—
IES-R — Impact of Event Scale – Revised22 · 0–4sum; 3 subscales; range 0–880–23 below clinical concern (total); 24–32 clinical concern; 33–36 probable PTSD (≥33); 37–88 severe — may suppress immune functionWeiss, D. S., & Marmar, C. R. (1997)freeLim, H.-K., Woo, J.-M., Kim, T.-S., et al. (2009)

Stress

InstrumentItems · responseScoringCut-offsSourceLicenceKorean version
PSS-10 — Perceived Stress Scale (10-item)10 · 0–4sum; R: 4,5,7,8; range 0–400–13 low (informal); 14–26 moderate (informal); 27–40 high (informal)Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983)freeLee, J., Shin, C., Ko, Y.-H., et al. (2012)

Affect and emotion regulation

InstrumentItems · responseScoringCut-offsSourceLicenceKorean version
PANAS — Positive and Negative Affect Schedule20 · 1–5sum; 2 subscales; range 10–50—Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988)freeLee, H.-H., Kim, E.-J., & Lee, M.-K. (2003)
ERQ — Emotion Regulation Questionnaire10 · 1–7mean; 2 subscales; range 1–7—Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003)free—

Well-being

InstrumentItems · responseScoringCut-offsSourceLicenceKorean version
SWLS — Satisfaction With Life Scale5 · 1–7sum; range 5–355–9 extremely dissatisfied; 10–14 dissatisfied; 15–19 slightly dissatisfied; 20 neutral; 21–25 slightly satisfied; 26–30 satisfied; 31–35 extremely satisfiedDiener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985)free—
WHO-5 — WHO-5 Well-Being Index5 · 0–5sum; × 4; range 0–1000–28 likely depression — assess further; 29–50 poor well-being; 51–100 well-being not reducedTopp, C. W., Østergaard, S. D., Søndergaard, S., & Bech, P. (2015)free—
SHS — Subjective Happiness Scale4 · 1–7mean; R: 4; range 1–7—Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999)free—
FS — Flourishing Scale8 · 1–7sum; range 8–56—Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010)free—
WEMWBS — Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale14 · 1–5sum; range 14–70—Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., et al. (2007)permission required—

Sleep

InstrumentItems · responseScoringCut-offsSourceLicenceKorean version
PSQI — Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index19 · 0–3manual; 7 subscales; range 0–210–5 good sleeper; 6–21 poor sleeperBuysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F., Monk, T. H., Berman, S. R., & Kupfer, D. J. (1989)90047-4)freeSohn, S. I., Kim, D. H., Lee, M. Y., & Cho, Y. W. (2012)
ISI — Insomnia Severity Index7 · 0–4sum; range 0–280–7 no clinically significant insomnia; 8–14 subthreshold insomnia; 15–21 moderate clinical insomnia; 22–28 severe clinical insomniaBastien, C. H., Vallières, A., & Morin, C. M. (2001)00065-4)permission requiredCho, Y. W., Song, M. L., & Morin, C. M. (2014)
ESS — Epworth Sleepiness Scale8 · 0–3sum; range 0–240–10 normal daytime sleepiness; 11–12 mild excessive sleepiness; 13–15 moderate excessive sleepiness; 16–24 severe excessive sleepinessJohns, M. W. (1991)permission requiredCho, Y. W., Lee, J. H., Son, H. K., Lee, S. H., Shin, C., & Johns, M. W. (2011)

Self, mindfulness and resilience

InstrumentItems · responseScoringCut-offsSourceLicenceKorean version
RSES — Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale10 · 0–3sum; R: 3,5,8,9,10; range 0–300–14 low (informal, <15); 15–25 normal range (informal); 26–30 high (informal)Rosenberg, M. (1965)freeJon, B.-J. (1974)
GSE — General Self-Efficacy Scale10 · 1–4sum; range 10–40—Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995)free—
MAAS — Mindful Attention Awareness Scale15 · 1–6mean; range 1–6—Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003)free—
CD-RISC-10 — Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (10-item)10 · 0–4sum; range 0–40—Campbell-Sills, L., & Stein, M. B. (2007)permission requiredBaek, H.-S., Lee, K.-U., Joo, E.-J., Lee, M.-Y., & Choi, K.-S. (2010)

Social

InstrumentItems · responseScoringCut-offsSourceLicenceKorean version
UCLA-3 — UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3)20 · 1–4sum; R: 1,5,6,9,10,15,16,19,20; range 20–80—Russell, D. W. (1996)free—
UCLA-3 (3-item) — Three-Item Loneliness Scale3 · 1–3sum; range 3–93–5 not lonely (conventional); 6–9 lonely (conventional, ≥6)Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004)free—

Work

InstrumentItems · responseScoringCut-offsSourceLicenceKorean version
MBI-HSS — Maslach Burnout Inventory – Human Services Survey22 · 0–6sum; 3 subscales—Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981)commercial—

Health behaviour

InstrumentItems · responseScoringCut-offsSourceLicenceKorean version
AUDIT — Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test10 · 0–4sum; range 0–400–7 low risk; 8–15 hazardous (brief advice); 16–19 harmful (brief counselling); 20–40 possible dependence (refer)Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993)freeLee, B. O., Lee, C. H., Lee, P. G., Choi, M. J., & Namkoong, K. (2000)
IPAQ-SF — International Physical Activity Questionnaire – Short Form7manual—Craig, C. L., Marshall, A. L., Sjöström, M., et al. (2003)freeOh, J. Y., Yang, Y. J., Kim, B. S., & Kang, J. H. (2007)

Personality

InstrumentItems · responseScoringCut-offsSourceLicenceKorean version
BFI-2 — Big Five Inventory-260 · 1–5mean; R: 3,4,5,8,9,11,12,16,17,22,23,24,25,26,28,29,30,31,36,37,42,44,45,47,48,49,50,51,55,58; 5 subscales; range 1–5—Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017)free—
BFI-10 — Big Five Inventory-1010 · 1–5mean; R: 1,3,4,5,7; 5 subscales; range 1–5—Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007)free—
TIPI — Ten-Item Personality Inventory10 · 1–7mean; R: 2,4,6,8,10; 5 subscales; range 1–7—Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003)00046-1)free—

Usability and UX

InstrumentItems · responseScoringCut-offsSourceLicenceKorean version
SUS — System Usability Scale10 · 1–5sus tool; range 0–10080.3–100 A; 74–80.29 B; 68–73.99 C; 51–67.99 D; 0–50.99 FBrooke, J. (1996)free—
UEQ — User Experience Questionnaire26 · -3–3ueq tool; 6 subscales; range -3–3—Laugwitz, B., Held, T., & Schrepp, M. (2008)free—
UMUX-LITE — Usability Metric for User Experience – Lite2 · 1–7formula; range 0–100—Lewis, J. R., Utesch, B. S., & Maher, D. E. (2013)free—
SEQ — Single Ease Question1 · 1–7mean; range 1–7—Sauro, J., & Dumas, J. S. (2009)free—
PSSUQ (v3) — Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire, version 316 · 1–7mean; 3 subscales; range 1–7—Lewis, J. R. (2002)free—
AttrakDiff — AttrakDiff28 · -3–3manual; 4 subscales; range -3–3—Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., & Koller, F. (2003)free—
NPS — Net Promoter Score1 · 0–10formula; range -100–100—Reichheld, F. F. (2003)free—

Workload

InstrumentItems · responseScoringCut-offsSourceLicenceKorean version
NASA-TLX — NASA Task Load Index6 · 0–100nasa_tlx tool; range 0–100—Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988)62386-9)free—

HCI, VR and robots

InstrumentItems · responseScoringCut-offsSourceLicenceKorean version
Trust in Automation (Jian) — Trust between People and Automation scale12 · 1–7mean; R: 1,2,3,4,5; range 1–7—Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A. M., & Drury, C. G. (2000)free—
IPQ — igroup Presence Questionnaire14 · -3–3manual; 4 subscales; range -3–3—Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., & Regenbrecht, H. (2001)free—
SSQ — Simulator Sickness Questionnaire16 · 0–3formula; 3 subscales—Kennedy, R. S., Lane, N. E., Berbaum, K. S., & Lilienthal, M. G. (1993)free—
Godspeed — Godspeed Questionnaire Series24 · 1–5mean; 5 subscales; range 1–5—Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., & Zoghbi, S. (2009)free—
TAM (PU · PEOU) — Technology Acceptance Model scales: Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use12 · 1–7mean; 2 subscales; range 1–7—Davis, F. D. (1989)free—

Emotion engineering

InstrumentItems · responseScoringCut-offsSourceLicenceKorean version
SAM — Self-Assessment Manikin3 · 1–9mean; 3 subscales; range 1–9—Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994)90063-9)free—

Sources were entered from the original publications and every DOI was checked against Crossref on 2026-10-16.