Usability studies produce a messy pile of artifacts: questionnaire exports, screen recordings, interaction logs, eye-tracking files. Most teams spend more time assembling that pile into something analyzable than actually learning from it. Here is how HCI teams run the whole pipeline in Neutropic.
Standard instruments, scored automatically
Drop in your Qualtrics or CSV export and ask for scores. Neutropic recognizes SUS, NASA-TLX, and UEQ item structures, applies the correct scoring (including reverse-coded items), and reports scale statistics with reliability alongside the scores — so a suspicious alpha never hides inside a spreadsheet.
A/B tests with the right test
Describe the design — between or within subjects, the outcome measure, the sample — and the agent picks and justifies the analysis, then the review agent verifies the choice. Results come back as an effect estimate with a confidence interval and a plain-language read, not just a p-value.
Interaction logs into behavior
- Funnel and path summaries from raw event logs.
- Task time, error, and hesitation metrics per condition.
- Segments where behavior diverged between variants, surfaced automatically.
Gaze and attention
Eye-tracking exports become AOI-based metrics and heatmaps on your actual interface screenshots. Ask "did participants ever look at the new control?" and get an answer with the frames to prove it.
One report, fully traceable
At the end you get a report where every figure links to the code and data that produced it — ready for a design review today and reproducible when someone questions it a quarter later.
